ਪ੍ਰਥਮਰਹਿਤਯਹਿਜਾਨਖੰਡੇਕੀਪਾਹੁਲਛਕੇ॥ ਸੋਈਸਿੰਘਪ੍ਰਧਾਨਅਵਰਨਪਾਹੁਲਜੋਲਏ॥

Akal Purakh Kee Rachha Hamnai, SarbLoh Dee Racchia Hamanai


This Message Board is designed to discuss issues concerning Gurmat, Gurbani, issues related to the Sikh Panth and Sikh history. Any type of posts that contain vulgar language, personal attacks, flame wars, and content against the teachings of Gurmat are STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Constructive, respectful debates with the aim to learn about Gurmat are encouraged. Arguments simply for the sake of argument will not be tolerated. Moderators and Administrators have authority to delete/edit such posts. Administrators and moderators only interest is to maintain a constructive, well run Message Board which promotes learning and Gurmat inspiration. www.tapoban.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced on these forums, and cannot be held responsible for the content of sites linked from these pages or the views of the members posting here.

 
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Is it ਲੈਤ or ਲੈ ਤ
Posted by: 13khalsa (IP Logged)
Date: April 20, 2009 03:58AM

When I was doing sehaj paat the other day, I was unsure to what was the correct reading of the following repeated lines in Gurbanne in ਭੈਰਉ ਮਹਲਾ ੫ ॥ i.e what was the correct pad ched.



ਨਾਮੁਲੈਤਸਭਦੂਖਹਨਾਸੁ ॥


Was it

ਨਾਮੁ ਲੈਤ ਸਭ ਦੂਖਹ ਨਾਸੁ ॥

Or

ਨਾਮੁ ਲੈ ਤ ਸਭ ਦੂਖਹ ਨਾਸੁ ॥

I've seen it written down as ਲੈਤ in the pad ched prints but something inside me was telling me it should be ਲੈ ਤ.

Can someone please clarify what is the correct reading.


I suppose if there are no reply's then this is probably another padched only Guru Sahibs knows.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/20/2009 09:45AM by admin.

Re: Is it ਲੈਤ or ਲੈ ਤ
Posted by: Khalsaspirit (IP Logged)
Date: April 20, 2009 06:59PM

Waheguru ji ka khalsa
Waheguru ji ki fateh

Khalsa jio,

It seems like ਲੈਤ is correct paddshed. Never noticed ਤ mukta as alone word (may be another GurSikh can confirm this). See this similar meaning tuk:

ਨਾਮੁ ਲੈਤ ਸਰਬ ਸੁਖ ਪਾਇਆ ॥੩॥ Panna 1298

Hope that helps. Bhul chuk di khima.

Guru Mehar Karay

Waheguru ji ka khalsa
Waheguru ji ki fateh

Re: Is it ਲੈਤ or ਲੈ ਤ
Posted by: 13khalsa (IP Logged)
Date: April 26, 2009 07:43AM

Veer Khalsaspirit Jee,


I have seen ਤ mukta as a alone word on many occasions in Gurbanee. In fact when I was doing Paat today the following line appeared

ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁਮਿਲੈਤਖੋਜੀਐਮਿਲਿਜੋਤੀਜੋਤਿਸਮਾਨੀ ॥1॥

I think the pad ched should be

ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਮਿਲੈ ਤ ਖੋਜੀਐ ਮਿਲਿ ਜੋਤੀ ਜੋਤਿ ਸਮਾਨੀ ॥1॥


However I am not very good at grammer so I was wandering if there was a grammatical reason for using ਲੈਤ rather than ਲੈ ਤ.



WaheGuru Jee Kaa Khalsa
WaheGuru Jee Kee Fateh

Re: Is it ਲੈਤ or ਲੈ ਤ
Posted by: Sikhan (IP Logged)
Date: May 14, 2009 07:55PM

Goroo Piaray Jeo !!

It seems separation of "ਤ" could bring conditions, if, but, and, or, arguments, cause and effect etc. Where as ਲੈਤ seems to reflect continuity in the "blessings with the company of Naam" or along with Naam- which is beyond these conditions.

WaheGuru Jee Kaa Khalsa
WaheGuru Jee Kee Fateh



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.



© 2007-2011 Gurdwara Tapoban Sahib